Claude Opus 5
Released Jul 24, 2026 · knowledge cutoff 2026-05
- Status
- Frontier
- Location
- United States
- Type
- LLM
- Modality
- Multimodal
- Context window
- 1M
- Max output
- 128K
- Speed (medium effort)
- 54 tok/s · 6.69s to first answer token
- Price ($/MTok in / out)
- $5 / $25
- Cost per task (medium effort)
- $0.62
- Open weights
- No
Benchmarks8 of 10 reported
GPQA Diamond
SWE-bench Verified
SWE-bench Pro
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Humanity's Last Exam
LMArena Elo
GDPval-AA v2
ARC-AGI-2
MMLU-Proretired
AIME (latest)retired
Strengths & weaknesses
Strengths
- Verifies its own work unprompted, delegates readily, and will widen a task's scope on its own judgement
- Holds the thread across long multi-step work and pins down vague requirements before building
- Reads a large unfamiliar codebase carefully before it changes anything
- Solves novel-pattern problems that no earlier model could, rather than recalling them
Weaknesses
- Verbose and pushy — it narrates constantly, and default output length responds to prompting more than to the effort setting
- Early users describe it as neurotic and apologetic, and less willing to follow a prescribed workflow than Opus 4.8
- Easy to misconfigure: effort and skill settings change its behavior more than the version bump does
HLE 56.3% no tools / 64.7% with tools. SWE-bench Verified 96.0% is Anthropic's own system-card figure (five-trial average); a third-party aggregator (vals.ai) cites 97.0%. GPQA Diamond varies 93.4-93.7% across trackers; 93.7% used. ARC-AGI-2 90.4% (max effort) and ARC-AGI-3 30.2% (high effort, a separate untracked scale) per ARC Prize (arcprize.org). Max output is 128K on the synchronous API, up to 300K via the Message Batches API. AIME not published — Anthropic appears to be moving to newer evals (IMO 2026, Frontier-Bench v0.1) instead. LMArena Elo 1493 is the "claude-opus-5-high" text-arena listing (arena.ai, 2026-09-13 update, rank 10); the "claude-opus-5-max" listing sits at 1487. SWE-bench Pro 79.2% is Anthropic's system-card figure (the launch post itself gives only relative claims), as relayed by BenchLM, llm-stats and DataNorth; the same table lists Fable 5 at 80.0 and GPT-5.6 Sol at 64.6. Terminal-Bench 2.1 84.64% is Vals AI's independent-harness measurement at high effort (vals.ai/models/anthropic_claude-opus-5, 2026-07-23) — third-party; Artificial Analysis is reported (via morphllm) to measure 89.1% at max effort in the Terminus 2 harness, but that figure could not be read from AA directly.
For developers
API model strings
- anthropic
claude-opus-5 - aws-bedrock
anthropic.claude-opus-5
Licence
Proprietary — weights not released
Retirement
No retirement announced
Lineage
Replaces Claude Opus 4.8
News
In the news
- Sep 1, 2026
Artificial Analysis puts Claude Fable 5.1 first on its Intelligence Index — at 20% more per task than Fable 5
- Sep 1, 2026
ARC Prize verifies Claude Fable 5.1 at 90.0% on ARC-AGI-2
- Aug 27, 2026
Anthropic offers 10,000 free Claude Team seats to academic scientists and widens AI for Science credits
- Jul 24, 2026
Artificial Analysis puts Claude Opus 5 first on its Intelligence Index
- Jul 24, 2026
Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5
- Jul 24, 2026
ARC Prize verifies Claude Opus 5 at 30.2% on ARC-AGI-3, quadrupling the previous best