Wait Which Model?
← Back to directory
Thinking Machines Lab

Inkling 2 Small

Released Nov 5, 2026 · knowledge cutoff 2026-06

Status
Unknown
Location
United States
Type
LLM
Modality
Multimodal
Context window
1M
Max output
—
Speed
157 tok/s · 29s to first answer token
Price ($/MTok in / out)
$0.30 / $1
Cost per task
$1.18
Open weights
No
News1 story
Strengths & weaknesses

Strengths

  • Trained with RL on hundreds of thousands of long-horizon coding tasks across several agent harnesses and compaction strategies
  • Learns faster than the first-generation Inkling models when fine-tuned on Tinker, matching Inkling Small's final score on a finance-document RL task in 75 steps
  • Reads images through a small 292M vision encoder, scoring 81.6% on MMMU Pro in the lab's own evaluation
  • Cheap to call on Tinker at $0.30 in and $1.00 out per million tokens

Weaknesses

  • Weights are closed at launch, with the Apache 2.0 release held back for external safety testing
  • The lab says it isn't a succinct communicator and its chat presentation is weaker, overusing slashes
  • Picks the wrong tool more often in codebases with many skills, and drops audio input that Inkling Small had

Thinking Machines Lab's first second-generation model, a 594B-total/17B-active MoE announced 2026-11-05 (thinkingmachines.ai/news/inkling-2-small). Available on Tinker for serverless inference, sampling and fine-tuning; the lab says it intends to publish full weights under Apache 2.0 'next week' pending safety evaluations, so openWeights and license stay false/null until the weights are actually out. Pricing is Tinker's serverless inference rate ($0.30 input, $0.03 cached, $1.00 output per MTok at 256K context); Tinker training is $1.50/MTok at 64K and $3.00 at 256K. contextWindow 1M is Artificial Analysis' figure and matches the 1M trajectory limit the lab used for evals; Tinker serves 256K (serverless) and 64K or 256K (training). knowledgeCutoff is the '2026-06' data cutoff on the lab's pretraining chart. The lab reports none of the tracked benchmarks: no GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench Verified, ARC-AGI-2 or LMArena figure; its SWE-bench Pro is the v2 Hard split (86.3%), HLE is HLE-Diamond (28.7%), Terminal-Bench is only Terminal Bench Science v0.1 (5.7%), and GDPval-AA is v2.1 (1630), a different scale from the v2 this key records. Also reported at effort 0.99 (xhigh): DeepSWE v1.1 72.1%, FrontierCode v2.0 25.4%, Vibe Code Bench v1.1 81.6%, AA-LCR v1.1 83.3%, MMMU Pro 81.6%. Artificial Analysis scores it 31 on Intelligence Index v5.0.1 (the reasoning variant, no effort label) at $1.18 per task, 157 output tokens/s and 29.08 s to first answer token. predecessorId is null: the lab calls it its 'second model generation' but names no model it replaces.

Benchmarks0 of 10 reported

MMLU-Proretired

—

GPQA Diamond

—

SWE-bench Verified

—

SWE-bench Pro

—

Terminal-Bench 2.1

—

AIME (latest)retired

—

Humanity's Last Exam

—

LMArena Elo

—

GDPval-AA v2

—

ARC-AGI-2

—
For developers

API model strings

  • thinking-machinesthinkingmachines/Inkling-2-Small

Licence

Proprietary — weights not released

Retirement

No retirement announced

Lineage

No recorded predecessor